<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BR Footnote &#187; Kurds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/tag/kurds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;An Ugly (and Untenable) Peace&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/2009/11/13/an-ugly-and-untenable-peace/</link>
		<comments>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/2009/11/13/an-ugly-and-untenable-peace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eikenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sectarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sectarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunni]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As violence diminishes in post-civil war Iraq, sectarianism is becoming entrenched in the political institutions of the country according to the first of a two-part series by Nir Rosen in our November/December 2009 issue.  What does this say about Iraq’s future?  A government rife with corruption and authoritarian tendencies begins to appear increasingly threatening when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As violence diminishes in post-civil war Iraq, sectarianism is becoming entrenched in the political institutions of the country according to the <a href="http://bostonreview.net/BR34.6/rosen.php" target="_blank">first of a two-part series by Nir Rosen</a> in our November/December 2009 issue.  What does this say about Iraq’s future?  A government rife with corruption and authoritarian tendencies begins to appear increasingly threatening when sectarianism is thrown into the mix.  Although the decrease in violence over the past two years is certainly something to be happy about, it shouldn’t cloud the necessity to foster minority protection rights.  Sunnis and Shias have tired of violence and recognized the legitimacy of the central government for now, but ten years down the road, when Shias are receiving all the civil service jobs and Iraqi schools are imposing a Shia-based education on its Sunni students, can we be sure that another civil war won’t break out?  And this isn’t even considering the volatile north, where the central government stands by watching the Kurdish authority committing <a href="http://www.hrw.org/en/node/86357" target="_blank">human rights abuses</a> against Shabaks, Yazidis and other minority ethnic groups.</p>
<p>The Obama administration’s attention is currently solely fixed on Afghanistan, and understandably so.  The President has <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/13/2741603.htm?section=world" target="_blank">rejected</a> all of the proposals set before him by his war council and continues to ponder over whether or not to employ an Iraq-styled “surge” in Afghanistan.  While considering the question of whether to increase troops or not, he should also ask if the “success” he would be looking to replicate with the surge is the type of success he wants.  The decision facing Obama has been compared to the dilemmas faced by <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iHqtgZEgqHKx4AoMf6TQjKZi0Azw" target="_blank">Lyndon Johnson in 1964</a> with respect to Vietnam.  <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/11/eikenberrys-stand.html" target="_blank">“Eikenberry’s stand”</a> gives the President some time to continue to weigh the pros and cons of a troop increase.  During this time, he should not only refer back to the consequences of Johnson’s decisions in Vietnam, but also to what is shaping up to become an untenable peace in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/2009/11/13/an-ugly-and-untenable-peace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

