<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BR Footnote &#187; waterboarding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/tag/waterboarding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Condoleezza Rice defends &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221; to Stanford students</title>
		<link>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/2009/04/29/condoleezza-rice-defends-enhanced-interrogation-to-stanford-students/</link>
		<comments>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/2009/04/29/condoleezza-rice-defends-enhanced-interrogation-to-stanford-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wilkerson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["enhanced interrogation"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoleezza Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I already posted this over at The Stanford Review&#8217;s blog, where I&#8217;ve been guest blogging as a token moderate/left-leaner. You can check out more of my thoughts at the Review, but here are some questions: How was this recording allowed? Rice&#8217;s people are usually pretty strict about such things. If this video makes ends up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already <a href="http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/04/29/condi-unscripted/">posted this</a> over at The Stanford Review&#8217;s blog, where I&#8217;ve been guest blogging as a token moderate/left-leaner.  </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ijEED_iviTA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ijEED_iviTA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>You can check out more of my thoughts at the Review, but here are some questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>How was this recording allowed? Rice&#8217;s people are usually pretty strict about such things. </li>
<li>If this video makes ends up getting a lot of attention&#8211;I think it could go either way as there is no single damning sentence or Fox News-worthy clip&#8211;will Rice ever do another dorm talk at Stanford?</li>
<li>Turning to substance, does 9/11, or preventing another 9/11, really change everything, as Rice asserts? Should public panic and demands for safety make it ok to undermine the moral and legal bases of our government?</li>
<li> Was the &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221; legal? Rice seems to think so, but much of the furor over memos released argues that it was not. </li>
</ol>
<p>Take it away folks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brfootnote.theclawmagazine.com/2009/04/29/condoleezza-rice-defends-enhanced-interrogation-to-stanford-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

